Click the button below to see similar posts for other categories

Can an Argument Have True Premises but Still Be Invalid?

Sure! Here’s a simpler version of your text:


Of course! An argument can have true statements but still not be valid. Here’s why:

  1. Validity vs. Truth:

    • Validity is about how something is set up. If the statements were true, they should logically lead to the conclusion. But if an argument is invalid, the conclusion doesn’t follow from the statements, even if they are true.
  2. Example:

    • Let’s look at this argument:
      • Statement 1: All cats are mammals. (True)
      • Statement 2: All dogs are mammals. (True)
      • Conclusion: So, all cats are dogs. (Not valid)
    • Although both statements are true, the conclusion doesn’t make sense.
  3. Why It Matters:

    • Knowing the difference is very important for thinking critically. Just because an argument sounds good with true statements doesn’t mean it's a strong argument.

In short, having true statements doesn’t always make an argument valid. So, always look at how the argument is set up when you judge it!

Related articles

Similar Categories
Introduction to Philosophy for Philosophy 101Ethics for Philosophy 101Introduction to Logic for Philosophy 101Key Moral TheoriesContemporary Ethical IssuesApplying Ethical TheoriesKey Existentialist ThinkersMajor Themes in ExistentialismExistentialism in LiteratureVedanta PhilosophyBuddhism and its PhilosophyTaoism and its PrinciplesPlato and His IdeasDescartes and RationalismKant's PhilosophyBasics of LogicPrinciples of Critical ThinkingIdentifying Logical FallaciesThe Nature of ConsciousnessMind-Body ProblemNature of the Self
Click HERE to see similar posts for other categories

Can an Argument Have True Premises but Still Be Invalid?

Sure! Here’s a simpler version of your text:


Of course! An argument can have true statements but still not be valid. Here’s why:

  1. Validity vs. Truth:

    • Validity is about how something is set up. If the statements were true, they should logically lead to the conclusion. But if an argument is invalid, the conclusion doesn’t follow from the statements, even if they are true.
  2. Example:

    • Let’s look at this argument:
      • Statement 1: All cats are mammals. (True)
      • Statement 2: All dogs are mammals. (True)
      • Conclusion: So, all cats are dogs. (Not valid)
    • Although both statements are true, the conclusion doesn’t make sense.
  3. Why It Matters:

    • Knowing the difference is very important for thinking critically. Just because an argument sounds good with true statements doesn’t mean it's a strong argument.

In short, having true statements doesn’t always make an argument valid. So, always look at how the argument is set up when you judge it!

Related articles