Courts have a tough job when deciding how much money someone should get when a contract is broken.
Here are some reasons why it's complicated:
Different Rules: Different places have different rules for figuring out how much money someone should get. This can make things confusing and unfair.
Hard-to-Measure Losses: Sometimes, the losses aren't easy to figure out. Courts often have trouble deciding what damages are possible to expect, leading to fights about what should be paid.
Duty to Minimize Losses: There is a rule that says if someone is harmed by a broken contract, they should try to reduce their losses. This makes it tricky for courts since they have to decide whether the person did enough to limit their damages.
To make this process easier, courts could use clearer rules and ask experts for their opinions. This might help in giving fair and consistent results when deciding on damages. But, for real changes to happen, bigger improvements in the system are necessary.
Courts have a tough job when deciding how much money someone should get when a contract is broken.
Here are some reasons why it's complicated:
Different Rules: Different places have different rules for figuring out how much money someone should get. This can make things confusing and unfair.
Hard-to-Measure Losses: Sometimes, the losses aren't easy to figure out. Courts often have trouble deciding what damages are possible to expect, leading to fights about what should be paid.
Duty to Minimize Losses: There is a rule that says if someone is harmed by a broken contract, they should try to reduce their losses. This makes it tricky for courts since they have to decide whether the person did enough to limit their damages.
To make this process easier, courts could use clearer rules and ask experts for their opinions. This might help in giving fair and consistent results when deciding on damages. But, for real changes to happen, bigger improvements in the system are necessary.