Courts have a tough job when it comes to checking if the rules made by agencies follow the right steps. Here are some of the challenges they face:
Complicated Rules: The many steps involved in making these rules can make it hard for judges to do a good job reviewing them.
Judges Trusting Agencies: Courts often trust that agencies know what they’re doing. This makes it tricky to find the right balance between checking their work and allowing them to operate freely.
Limited Public Input: When not enough people join in during the comment period, it can hurt the credibility of the rules being made.
To improve this situation, there are some ideas:
Make the rule-making process clearer and easier to understand.
Encourage more people to participate and share their thoughts during the rule-making process.
Set clearer guidelines for judges to help them review the rules more effectively while still allowing agencies to do their jobs.
Courts have a tough job when it comes to checking if the rules made by agencies follow the right steps. Here are some of the challenges they face:
Complicated Rules: The many steps involved in making these rules can make it hard for judges to do a good job reviewing them.
Judges Trusting Agencies: Courts often trust that agencies know what they’re doing. This makes it tricky to find the right balance between checking their work and allowing them to operate freely.
Limited Public Input: When not enough people join in during the comment period, it can hurt the credibility of the rules being made.
To improve this situation, there are some ideas:
Make the rule-making process clearer and easier to understand.
Encourage more people to participate and share their thoughts during the rule-making process.
Set clearer guidelines for judges to help them review the rules more effectively while still allowing agencies to do their jobs.