Different countries have their own ways of doing judicial review. This means looking at laws to make sure they follow the rules in the country’s constitution. Here’s how it works in a few places:
United States: Judicial review started with a famous case called Marbury v. Madison in 1803. In the U.S., about 30% of cases are looked at by the Supreme Court.
United Kingdom: In the UK, there are some limits on judicial review. The focus is more on if laws are legal, not on how good they are. Only about 10% of cases are about challenging laws.
Germany: Germany has a special court called the Federal Constitutional Court. This court deals with over 2,000 cases every year. About 15% of these cases are important enough to be checked for constitutional issues.
Canada: In Canada, the Supreme Court often takes part in judicial review. About 15% of the cases they look at involve rights or rules in the constitution.
Each country has its own way of making sure laws are fair and follow the rules.
Different countries have their own ways of doing judicial review. This means looking at laws to make sure they follow the rules in the country’s constitution. Here’s how it works in a few places:
United States: Judicial review started with a famous case called Marbury v. Madison in 1803. In the U.S., about 30% of cases are looked at by the Supreme Court.
United Kingdom: In the UK, there are some limits on judicial review. The focus is more on if laws are legal, not on how good they are. Only about 10% of cases are about challenging laws.
Germany: Germany has a special court called the Federal Constitutional Court. This court deals with over 2,000 cases every year. About 15% of these cases are important enough to be checked for constitutional issues.
Canada: In Canada, the Supreme Court often takes part in judicial review. About 15% of the cases they look at involve rights or rules in the constitution.
Each country has its own way of making sure laws are fair and follow the rules.