Different ideas in International Relations (IR) have a tough time when it comes to humanitarian interventions. Let’s break down how three main viewpoints see this challenge:

1. Realism:

   • Realism looks at the interests of countries and how powerful they are.
   • It often ignores moral duties and focuses on a country’s right to govern itself.
   • This makes it hard to mix military actions with helping people.

2. Liberalism:

   • Liberalism talks about working together and following international rules.
   • It faces challenges when countries can’t agree on what to do.
   • It also has a hard time figuring out if an intervention is right, because countries have different goals.

3. Constructivism:

   • Constructivism thinks about how identities and social norms play a role.
   • Problems come from different stories and views about sovereignty and helping out.
   • This approach risks overlooking what local people really need.

To tackle these challenges, we need a thoughtful plan that includes teamwork among countries, respect for their rights, and understanding local situations.