Weber and Arendt both explore the idea of freedom in interesting ways, showing how complicated life was in the 20th century.

1. Weber's View:

   • Rationalization: Weber talks about how things like rules and larger organizations can impact freedom. He believes that the growth of these big, structured systems can create an "iron cage," making it hard for people to feel free.
   • Freedom as Choice: For Weber, freedom means having the ability to make choices. But many of these choices can be limited by society and its systems, which can stop us from feeling truly free.

2. Arendt's View:

   • Active Participation: Arendt sees freedom very differently. She believes that real freedom comes from being involved in politics and working together with others. This is how people can change their world.
   • The Human Condition: In her work, Arendt talks about how modern life has broken apart public spaces, making people feel disconnected from politics. She thinks it's important to reclaim this space to feel true freedom.

In short, Weber questions whether freedom is possible in today’s structured societies. On the other hand, Arendt offers a more hopeful approach that focuses on getting involved and participating.

Both thinkers give us valuable ideas to consider when thinking about our own freedom in today’s world. Their thoughts are especially relevant now, as we deal with technology and the importance of being active in politics.