Recent Supreme Court cases have really put the power of judicial review to the test. This has affected many parts of American life and law. Here are some important cases to know about:
Shelby County v. Holder (2013): In this case, the Supreme Court decided to cancel important parts of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. It was a close decision, 5 to 4. This ruling showed that the Court could change laws based on the Constitution. It had a big impact on voting rights for around 4 million voters in several states.
Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt (2016): Here, the Court ruled against certain Texas rules about abortion clinics. The decision was 5 to 3. The judges highlighted how important it is to balance what states want with what individuals have the right to do. This case showed how the Court checks state laws that might break constitutional rights.
Trump v. Hawaii (2018): In this case, the Supreme Court supported a travel ban for people from some countries. The decision was also close, 5 to 4. This ruling illustrated how the Court looks at government power and national security while considering the separation of powers.
These cases show how the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution. Sometimes this leads to big changes in policies and civil rights, impacting millions of Americans. Overall, these recent years have highlighted the Supreme Court's important role in shaping and defining the limits of judicial review.
Recent Supreme Court cases have really put the power of judicial review to the test. This has affected many parts of American life and law. Here are some important cases to know about:
Shelby County v. Holder (2013): In this case, the Supreme Court decided to cancel important parts of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. It was a close decision, 5 to 4. This ruling showed that the Court could change laws based on the Constitution. It had a big impact on voting rights for around 4 million voters in several states.
Whole Woman's Health v. Hellerstedt (2016): Here, the Court ruled against certain Texas rules about abortion clinics. The decision was 5 to 3. The judges highlighted how important it is to balance what states want with what individuals have the right to do. This case showed how the Court checks state laws that might break constitutional rights.
Trump v. Hawaii (2018): In this case, the Supreme Court supported a travel ban for people from some countries. The decision was also close, 5 to 4. This ruling illustrated how the Court looks at government power and national security while considering the separation of powers.
These cases show how the Supreme Court interprets the Constitution. Sometimes this leads to big changes in policies and civil rights, impacting millions of Americans. Overall, these recent years have highlighted the Supreme Court's important role in shaping and defining the limits of judicial review.