Martin Luther King Jr. had a different way of fighting for civil rights compared to other leaders like Malcolm X and Stokely Carmichael.

1. Nonviolence Philosophy:

   • King believed in fighting without violence. This was very different from others who wanted to use stronger methods. Some people in the movement did not agree with King. They thought that being peaceful wasn't enough to fight against unfair treatment.

2. Integration vs. Black Nationalism:

   • King wanted people of all races to come together as one. In contrast, Malcolm X supported black nationalism, which focused on pride in being Black. This difference caused arguments among supporters. Some thought King’s peaceful ways were too weak.

3. Criticism of Compromise:

   • Some critics believed King was giving in too much to those who were causing harm. They worried that this would slow down the progress for change.

To help with these issues, supporters of King's ideas can teach others about how nonviolence can work. They can show examples of successful peaceful movements. Also, talking and listening to each other can help different groups understand one another better. This way, everyone can work together to make civil rights stronger and better for all.