Judicial review is an important way to keep the balance of power between different parts of the government. However, it has some problems that can make it less effective.
Limited Accessibility: Not everyone can easily use the judicial system.
Judicial Activism vs. Restraint: There’s a big debate about how much the courts should get involved.
Minimal Checks on the Judiciary Itself: The judges have a lot of power, and this could lead to problems.
In summary, judicial review is meant to be a key way to check the power of lawmakers and executive leaders. But the challenges it faces can weaken its effectiveness. It’s important to tackle these issues to maintain the rule of law and provide justice in our democracy.
Judicial review is an important way to keep the balance of power between different parts of the government. However, it has some problems that can make it less effective.
Limited Accessibility: Not everyone can easily use the judicial system.
Judicial Activism vs. Restraint: There’s a big debate about how much the courts should get involved.
Minimal Checks on the Judiciary Itself: The judges have a lot of power, and this could lead to problems.
In summary, judicial review is meant to be a key way to check the power of lawmakers and executive leaders. But the challenges it faces can weaken its effectiveness. It’s important to tackle these issues to maintain the rule of law and provide justice in our democracy.