Combining Gibbs' and Schön's reflection models can really help teachers, especially when they're in practice. These models look at different parts of reflecting on what we do in teaching. When used together, they can make learning and teaching better.
Gibbs' Reflective Cycle has six steps: Description, Feelings, Evaluation, Analysis, Conclusion, and Action Plan. This cycle helps teachers think deeply about their experiences. It guides them through what happened, how they felt, what went well, and what they might do differently next time.
Schön's Reflection in Action focuses on reflecting while teaching. Schön believes that teachers often have to make quick decisions while they're in the classroom. This model highlights how important it is to think about teaching as it happens, helping teachers learn and adapt right away.
Using both models together gives a fuller picture of reflecting on teaching. Here are some benefits of mixing Gibbs' and Schön's models:
Complete Reflection: With Gibbs' model, teachers review all parts of their teaching experience. This step-by-step approach helps them think about their feelings and what worked or didn’t. At the same time, Schön’s model lets them reflect on the spot, tackling challenges as they come. Together, these models give a deeper understanding of teaching moments, both during and after class.
Better Problem-Solving Skills: Schön's model helps teachers quickly come up with solutions in tricky situations. By also using Gibbs’ structured method, they can look back at how they handled things later. This combination builds stronger problem-solving skills, allowing teachers to compare their quick reactions to longer-term teaching goals.
Stronger Emotional Awareness: Understanding feelings is key to teaching well. Gibbs' cycle focuses on how important feelings are in reflection. By acknowledging their emotions, teachers can see what drives their actions and how their feelings affect their teaching. Schön’s emphasis on instinctual reactions during teaching adds to this, reminding teachers to pay attention to both their feelings and their students' experiences as they teach.
More Student Engagement: Teachers who think about their teaching both during and after can better spot how engaged their students are. With Schön’s model, they can read the classroom and change their teaching on the go. Then, using Gibbs' cycle, they can reflect on how well those changes worked, leading to better ways to involve students.
Better Goal Setting and Action Plans: Gibbs’ model ends with creating a plan for future teaching. This is essential for ongoing growth. By mixing the insights gained from Schön’s real-time reflections into Gibbs’ structured approach, teachers can set realistic goals based on what they see happening in their classrooms.
Building a Reflective Culture: Using both models promotes a culture of reflection among teachers and students. Schön’s model encourages teachers to show their reflections, helping students understand the value of thinking about their practice. Meanwhile, Gibbs’ structured model can help students learn how to express their reflections formally. This approach fosters a mindset of continuous learning in the classroom.
Customized Professional Growth: Every teaching experience is unique. By using both reflection methods, teachers can tailor their professional development. They can use Schön’s quick reflections to deal with specific situations and Gibbs’ model to spot larger themes they need to work on. This broader view can help shape training programs to better fit real teaching experiences.
Support for Action Research: Teachers doing action research can benefit from blending these models. Schön’s focus on reflection in action helps identify problems quickly and try out solutions. This exploratory attitude pairs well with Gibbs' reflective cycle, which encourages thorough evaluation of results. Together, they provide a solid structure for ongoing examination of teaching practices, leading to real improvements.
Encouraging Flexibility and Resilience: In today’s changing education environment, being adaptable is crucial. By using both models, teachers build resilience and learn to adjust their teaching based on their reflections. Schön’s model helps with on-the-spot changes, while Gibbs encourages planning ahead. This flexibility helps teachers meet the diverse needs of their students.
Promoting Team Reflection: Using both models can encourage teamwork among teachers. By sharing experiences through Gibbs’ framework, educators can analyze their shared experiences while getting feedback. At the same time, Schön’s model allows for spontaneous conversations about insights that arise while teaching. This collaboration builds community among teachers, leading to shared growth.
In summary, combining Gibbs’ and Schön’s reflection models offers many benefits for teachers. By blending the structured depth of Gibbs with the flexible nature of Schön, teachers can gain a better understanding of their practice, improve their problem-solving skills, and keep enhancing their teaching methods. This approach not only supports teacher growth but also creates a lively, engaged atmosphere for students, highlighting the importance of reflection in effective teaching.
Combining Gibbs' and Schön's reflection models can really help teachers, especially when they're in practice. These models look at different parts of reflecting on what we do in teaching. When used together, they can make learning and teaching better.
Gibbs' Reflective Cycle has six steps: Description, Feelings, Evaluation, Analysis, Conclusion, and Action Plan. This cycle helps teachers think deeply about their experiences. It guides them through what happened, how they felt, what went well, and what they might do differently next time.
Schön's Reflection in Action focuses on reflecting while teaching. Schön believes that teachers often have to make quick decisions while they're in the classroom. This model highlights how important it is to think about teaching as it happens, helping teachers learn and adapt right away.
Using both models together gives a fuller picture of reflecting on teaching. Here are some benefits of mixing Gibbs' and Schön's models:
Complete Reflection: With Gibbs' model, teachers review all parts of their teaching experience. This step-by-step approach helps them think about their feelings and what worked or didn’t. At the same time, Schön’s model lets them reflect on the spot, tackling challenges as they come. Together, these models give a deeper understanding of teaching moments, both during and after class.
Better Problem-Solving Skills: Schön's model helps teachers quickly come up with solutions in tricky situations. By also using Gibbs’ structured method, they can look back at how they handled things later. This combination builds stronger problem-solving skills, allowing teachers to compare their quick reactions to longer-term teaching goals.
Stronger Emotional Awareness: Understanding feelings is key to teaching well. Gibbs' cycle focuses on how important feelings are in reflection. By acknowledging their emotions, teachers can see what drives their actions and how their feelings affect their teaching. Schön’s emphasis on instinctual reactions during teaching adds to this, reminding teachers to pay attention to both their feelings and their students' experiences as they teach.
More Student Engagement: Teachers who think about their teaching both during and after can better spot how engaged their students are. With Schön’s model, they can read the classroom and change their teaching on the go. Then, using Gibbs' cycle, they can reflect on how well those changes worked, leading to better ways to involve students.
Better Goal Setting and Action Plans: Gibbs’ model ends with creating a plan for future teaching. This is essential for ongoing growth. By mixing the insights gained from Schön’s real-time reflections into Gibbs’ structured approach, teachers can set realistic goals based on what they see happening in their classrooms.
Building a Reflective Culture: Using both models promotes a culture of reflection among teachers and students. Schön’s model encourages teachers to show their reflections, helping students understand the value of thinking about their practice. Meanwhile, Gibbs’ structured model can help students learn how to express their reflections formally. This approach fosters a mindset of continuous learning in the classroom.
Customized Professional Growth: Every teaching experience is unique. By using both reflection methods, teachers can tailor their professional development. They can use Schön’s quick reflections to deal with specific situations and Gibbs’ model to spot larger themes they need to work on. This broader view can help shape training programs to better fit real teaching experiences.
Support for Action Research: Teachers doing action research can benefit from blending these models. Schön’s focus on reflection in action helps identify problems quickly and try out solutions. This exploratory attitude pairs well with Gibbs' reflective cycle, which encourages thorough evaluation of results. Together, they provide a solid structure for ongoing examination of teaching practices, leading to real improvements.
Encouraging Flexibility and Resilience: In today’s changing education environment, being adaptable is crucial. By using both models, teachers build resilience and learn to adjust their teaching based on their reflections. Schön’s model helps with on-the-spot changes, while Gibbs encourages planning ahead. This flexibility helps teachers meet the diverse needs of their students.
Promoting Team Reflection: Using both models can encourage teamwork among teachers. By sharing experiences through Gibbs’ framework, educators can analyze their shared experiences while getting feedback. At the same time, Schön’s model allows for spontaneous conversations about insights that arise while teaching. This collaboration builds community among teachers, leading to shared growth.
In summary, combining Gibbs’ and Schön’s reflection models offers many benefits for teachers. By blending the structured depth of Gibbs with the flexible nature of Schön, teachers can gain a better understanding of their practice, improve their problem-solving skills, and keep enhancing their teaching methods. This approach not only supports teacher growth but also creates a lively, engaged atmosphere for students, highlighting the importance of reflection in effective teaching.