Judicial review looks closely at what agencies do in university rules. Here are some important points to know:
Arbitrary and Capricious Standard: About half of the time, when cases are reviewed this way, courts decide that the agency's actions were not valid.
Substantial Evidence: Courts back the agency's decisions around 65% of the time when there’s good evidence to support those choices.
Chevrón Deference: When rules are unclear, courts usually trust the agency’s views about 80% of the time.
Procedural Fairness: About 25% of cases succeed because there were problems with how the procedures were followed.
Judicial review looks closely at what agencies do in university rules. Here are some important points to know:
Arbitrary and Capricious Standard: About half of the time, when cases are reviewed this way, courts decide that the agency's actions were not valid.
Substantial Evidence: Courts back the agency's decisions around 65% of the time when there’s good evidence to support those choices.
Chevrón Deference: When rules are unclear, courts usually trust the agency’s views about 80% of the time.
Procedural Fairness: About 25% of cases succeed because there were problems with how the procedures were followed.