When teachers are learning how to teach, it’s important for them to think about their experiences. This process is called reflective practice. A good way to do this is by using models that focus on students. Two well-known models are Gibbs' Reflective Cycle and Schön's Reflection-in-Action.
Gibbs' Reflective Cycle
Gibbs' Reflective Cycle is like a step-by-step guide with six clear stages:
This model helps new teachers break down their experiences.
Starting with a clear description is important. It helps teachers think honestly about what happened. This can improve their emotional awareness, which is crucial for good teaching.
In the Evaluation stage, teachers figure out what worked and what didn’t. Then, in the Analysis stage, they try to understand why things unfolded the way they did.
Finally, in the Action Plan stage, they come up with ways to improve for the future. Gibbs' model helps teachers focus on what their students need, allowing them to learn and adjust based on experiences and feedback.
Schön's Reflection-in-Action
On the other hand, Schön's Reflection-in-Action is more flexible and is based on thinking while teaching. This means teachers reflect on what they're doing as they’re doing it.
This approach recognizes that teaching is complex and that learning happens in real-time. It highlights how teachers need to change their methods based on student reactions and the classroom atmosphere.
By reflecting while teaching, educators can see how their actions affect student learning. This helps create a classroom that truly puts students first. It’s essential for teachers to be adaptable since every student is different, and learning conditions can change quickly.
Choosing the Right Model
Both Gibbs and Schön have strengths when it comes to student-centered learning. Gibbs' structured approach is really helpful for new teachers who need support and clear steps to follow. It guides them as they reflect and helps them grow in ways that focus on what students need.
Schön's model, however, is ideal for more experienced teachers. These teachers already understand teaching strategies and want to refine their skills while they’re teaching based on what’s happening in the moment.
In the end, whether a teacher uses Gibbs' Reflective Cycle or Schön's Reflection-in-Action can depend on their experience level and the situation in their classroom. Both methods are valuable for improving teaching and keeping students in mind.
Mixing ideas from both models can create a well-rounded approach. This way, teachers can develop organized reflection while also being adaptable, making sure that student needs always come first.
When teachers are learning how to teach, it’s important for them to think about their experiences. This process is called reflective practice. A good way to do this is by using models that focus on students. Two well-known models are Gibbs' Reflective Cycle and Schön's Reflection-in-Action.
Gibbs' Reflective Cycle
Gibbs' Reflective Cycle is like a step-by-step guide with six clear stages:
This model helps new teachers break down their experiences.
Starting with a clear description is important. It helps teachers think honestly about what happened. This can improve their emotional awareness, which is crucial for good teaching.
In the Evaluation stage, teachers figure out what worked and what didn’t. Then, in the Analysis stage, they try to understand why things unfolded the way they did.
Finally, in the Action Plan stage, they come up with ways to improve for the future. Gibbs' model helps teachers focus on what their students need, allowing them to learn and adjust based on experiences and feedback.
Schön's Reflection-in-Action
On the other hand, Schön's Reflection-in-Action is more flexible and is based on thinking while teaching. This means teachers reflect on what they're doing as they’re doing it.
This approach recognizes that teaching is complex and that learning happens in real-time. It highlights how teachers need to change their methods based on student reactions and the classroom atmosphere.
By reflecting while teaching, educators can see how their actions affect student learning. This helps create a classroom that truly puts students first. It’s essential for teachers to be adaptable since every student is different, and learning conditions can change quickly.
Choosing the Right Model
Both Gibbs and Schön have strengths when it comes to student-centered learning. Gibbs' structured approach is really helpful for new teachers who need support and clear steps to follow. It guides them as they reflect and helps them grow in ways that focus on what students need.
Schön's model, however, is ideal for more experienced teachers. These teachers already understand teaching strategies and want to refine their skills while they’re teaching based on what’s happening in the moment.
In the end, whether a teacher uses Gibbs' Reflective Cycle or Schön's Reflection-in-Action can depend on their experience level and the situation in their classroom. Both methods are valuable for improving teaching and keeping students in mind.
Mixing ideas from both models can create a well-rounded approach. This way, teachers can develop organized reflection while also being adaptable, making sure that student needs always come first.